Blogs 36 - 40 of 213
Bush Secrecy Reaches the Senate
Oh, what a tangled web of secrecy Republicans are weaving: On Sept. 20, The Dallas Morning News reported that a Republican senator is secretly blocking a bill reversing a presidential executive order that allows former presidents to seal their records for an indefinite period of time.
“We need to smoke out whoever it is,” said Lee White, executive director of the National Coalition for History, one of the legislation’s leading advocates, in the newspaper. “Maybe somebody at the White House called a Republican senator and said put a hold on it.”
Bush’s executive order allows former presidents, vice presidents or their representatives (if they are incapacitated or deceased) to block the release of their records, potentially shielding important information from the public.
Public Citizen and other groups filed a lawsuit in 2001 challenging the executive order. The lawsuit is still pending.
Posted 09-21-2007 4:34 PM EDT
Outing the Energy Insiders Given Access to Cheney, Staff
The Washington Post landed a big scoop on July 18: A former White House official gave the newspaper the Bush administration’s confidential list showing how many energy industry insiders Vice President Dick Cheney and his aides met with before writing up the administration’s energy task force report.
In total, about 300 groups and individuals, many from the energy industry, met with task force staff members, according to the list compiled in 2001. Some of the groups and individuals met with Cheney.
The attempt to obtain the list of meeting attendees has been ongoing for years. In 2004, in response to a lawsuit filed to shake loose the list, the Supreme Court agreed with the administration’s belief that its internal deliberations should not be released to public scrutiny, according to the Post.
“I never knew why they fought so hard to keep it secret,” Charles A. Samuels, outside counsel to the Association of Home Appliances Manufacturers (which participated in a meeting on tax credits for “super-efficient” appliances), told the Post. “I am sure the vast majority of the meetings were very policy-oriented meetings - exactly what should take place.”
Posted 07-18-2007 1:46 PM EDT
Former Surgeon General Says Administration Silenced Him
More evidence has surfaced that the Bush administration is silencing officials and other representatives whose views, while scientifically correct, do not mesh with its political agenda.
This time, former surgeon general Richard H. Carmona, who served under Bush from 2002 to 2006, said he was silenced on issues such as the debate over whether the government should fund embryonic stem cell research, something Bush opposes, according to a story published July 11 in The Washington Post.
“Anything that doesn’t fit into the political appointees’ ideological, theological or political agenda is often ignored, marginalized or simply buried,” Carmona said. “The problem with this approach is that in public health, as in a democracy, there is nothing worse than ignoring science or marginalizing the voice of science for reasons driven by changing political winds.”
Carmona made the statement when testifying July 10 before the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. Rep. Henry Waxman (D-Calif.), the committee’s chairman, said Congress needs to protect the surgeon general’s office from such politicization.
Congress should find ways to prevent the administration from silencing those who just want to get facts about anything - from public health to the environment - out to the public.
Posted 07-11-2007 4:52 PM EDT
FDA Officials Kept Blank Calendars
If you have been wanting to know who two top officials at the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) have been meeting with in recent years, you would be out of luck.
Despite the fact that their jobs involve regular sit-downs with drug company executives, lobbyists and others, the public calendars of Dr. Janet Woodcock and Dr. Steven Galson have been almost completely blank, according to The Associated Press.
Woodcock’s calendar had only three listings between January 1999 and December 2006. That’s strange, because during that time, she was the director of the center for drug evaluation and research and then deputy commissioner for operations. Both positions required her meetings to be listed.
Galson, who took over the drug chief position from Woodcock full-time in July 2005, had no listings.
The FDA says it simply was an administrative oversight (and began to fill in the calendar, after being contacted by congressional staff).
But Rep. Bart Stupak (D-Mich.), who chairs the House Energy and Commerce Committee’s oversight and investigations subcommittee, said this is an example of the FDA’s lack of accountability.
Posted 07-02-2007 3:59 PM EDT
Cheney Battles Executive Branch Agency Trying to Collect Classified Data
Vice President Dick Cheney must love his secrets. He doesn’t even like to share with his own team.
Check out the latest: Apparently, Cheney has exempted himself from the PRESIDENTIAL order setting up procedures for protecting classified information, according to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
For the past four years, Cheney’s office has refused to cooperate with a National Archives and Records Administration office charged with monitoring classification in the executive branch, according to stories in the June 22 Washington Post and New York Times.
Not only did the vice president’s office not comply with a routine annual request for data on staff classification of internal documents, but in 2004, it also blocked an on-site inspection of records that other executive branch agencies go through, according to a letter to the vice president sent by Rep. Henry Waxman (D-Calif.), chairman of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
And after the Archives office continued to complain about the matter, Cheney’s staff proposed eliminating the office.
“I know the vice president wants to operate with unprecedented secrecy,” Waxman told The New York Times. “But this is absurd. This order is designed to keep classified information safe. His argument is really that he’s not part of the executive branch, so he doesn’t have to comply.”
Posted 06-22-2007 12:44 PM EDT
|home | secrecy blog | about us | join us | other secrecy sites|
Powered by Public Citizen - www.citizen.org
Copyright © 2016 Public Citizen. All rights reserved.