Blogs 21 - 30 of 213
Despite its promises, the Republican National Committee (RNC) no longer will try to restore missing e-mails sent by White House officials on RNC accounts, according to Rep. Henry Waxman (D-Calif.), chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, during a Feb. 26 hearing.
White House officials - including former presidential adviser Karl Rove - had used RNC accounts for government business, even though rules stated that they had to use official channels to conduct government business, according to the Feb. 27 Washington Post. (Administration officials have acknowledged such practices.)
The RNC had told the committee previously that it was trying to restore e-mails from 2001 to 2003, when the RNC’s policy was to purge all e-mails after 30 days.
Somehow, the RNC had a change of heart.
“The result is a potentially enormous gap in the historical record,” Waxman said, including the prelude to the
Posted 02-27-2008 12:44 PM EDT
Army Restricts Access to Unclassified Information
The Army has closed public access to a digital library that contains unclassified field and technical information, according to The Washington Post.
On Feb. 6, the Reimer Digital Library was moved behind a firewall, protected by a password.
The Army says it is limiting access to comply with Defense Department policies for tightening the security of military Web sites and to keep better track of who is accessing these sites.
However, the Project on Government Secrecy, a program within the nonprofit Federation of American Scientists, is hoping to restore access to the documents. The group filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request on Feb. 13 for all of the unclassified, publicly releasable documents in the library’s collection so it can post the material on the group’s Web site.
“They can configure Army Web sites however they like,” the Project on Government Secrecy's director, Steven Aftergood, is quoted in the Post as saying. “What they cannot do is to withhold information from the public that is subject to release under the FOIA. … What we really want to do is to persuade them to adopt a reasonable policy of openness, not to provide an alternative - unless we have to.”
Posted 02-21-2008 12:49 PM EDT
Public Health Agency Suppresses Hazardous Substances Report
Same story, different cast: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is blocking the release of a report that studies environmental hazards in the eight
The study, originally set for release last July, warns that more than nine million people living in more than two dozen “areas of concern” - including those living in Chicago, Detroit, Cleveland and Milwaukee - could face increased health risks from exposure to contaminants such as pesticides, lead, mercury or other pollutants, according to The Center for Public Integrity.
The government has said the report’s quality was below expectations and was still being reviewed. (Dozens of experts have reviewed drafts of the report since 2004.) And the individual who oversaw the study has been demoted after pushing to release the
“It’s not good because it’s inconvenient,” said Canadian biologist Michael Gilbertson, a Canadian biologist who was a peer reviewer for the report. “The whole problem with all this kind of work is wrapped up in that word ‘injury.’ If you have injury, that implies liability. Liability, of course, implies damages, legal processes, and costs of remedial action. The governments, frankly, in both countries are so heavily aligned with, particularly, the chemical industry, that the worst amongst the bureaucracies is that they really do not want any evidence of effect or injury to be allowed out there.”
Posted 02-18-2008 1:17 PM EDT
House Issues Contempt Citations Against White House Aides
On Feb. 14, the House of Representatives approved contempt citations against White House aides for refusing to cooperate with an inquiry into allegations that political motives were behind the firing of
The citations were issued against White House Chief of Staff Joshua B. Bolten and former White House counsel Harriet E. Miers. Bolten’s contempt resolution notes that he has refused to turn over subpoenaed documents and e-mails sought by the House Judiciary Committee in the investigation, according to The Washington Post.
Miers is cited because she refused to testify after she was subpoenaed to come before the committee last summer.
For almost a year, Bush has not allowed any current or former member of his West Wing staff to testify in the investigation. Bush, citing executive privilege, has offered to allow staffers to testify only if the testimony is taken without transcripts and under oath.
“This is beyond arrogance. This is hubris taken to the ultimate degree,” said House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.).
Posted 02-18-2008 1:14 PM EDT
Three's a charm
Three’s a charm, unless you’re the Internal Revenue Service, that is. The agency is flouting three court orders requiring it to provide a nationally recognized researcher with statistical data on how the agency enforces the nation’s tax laws.
On Feb. 11, Public Citizen, along with the Seattle, Wash. law firm Davis Wright Tremaine filed a lawsuit on behalf of the researcher, Susan B. Long and her organization, the Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse (TRAC).
Posted 02-15-2008 5:36 PM EDT
Senators Introduce Bill for Oversight of State Secrets Privilege
It’s no surprise that the Bush administration wants to invoke the state secrets privilege in court when it can. Plainly speaking, this White House loves its secrets.
But a couple of influential senators are trying to provide some oversight for the use of the state secrets privilege, which allows the government to prevent sensitive national security information from being publicly disclosed as evidence in court.
Sens. Edward Kennedy (D-Mass.) and Arlen Specter (R-Pa.) introduced on Jan. 22 the State Secrets Protection Act (S. 2533). The bill would require courts in civil lawsuits to look at the evidence for which the administration is trying to use the privilege and assess whether the administration’s assertions are valid, according to a statement from Kennedy. Currently, there is no law giving courts guidelines for the use of the states secret privilege in civil cases.
“When federal courts accept the executive branch’s state secrets claims as absolute, our system of checks and balances breaks down,” Kennedy said in his statement. “By refusing to consider key pieces of evidence, or by dismissing lawsuits outright without considering any evidence at all, courts give the executive branch the ability to violate American laws and constitutional rights without any accountability or oversight, and innocent victims are left unable to obtain justice.”
Posted 01-30-2008 6:25 PM EDT
White House E-mails Go Missing
Missing: 473 days’ worth of White House e-mails.
Yes, for hundreds of days between 2003 and 2005, the White House has no archives of e-mail messages for one or more of its offices, according to the summary of an internal White House study released by House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Henry Waxman (D-Calif.) that was covered in The Washington Post.
Early in the Bush administration, the White House threw out the custom archiving system the
According to the Post, no presidential office e-mails were archived on Dec. 17, 20 or 21 in 2003, which was the week after Saddam Hussein’s capture. And no e-mails were archived in the vice president’s office for four days in early October 2003 - dates that match up with the beginning of the Justice Department probe into the leak of a CIA officer’s identity, according to a summary of the White House study.
Of course, the White House is disputing the credibility of its own study. White House spokesman Tony Fratto said there was no evidence that e-mails are missing.
Guess the White House study doesn’t count as evidence …
Posted 01-22-2008 5:46 PM EDT
Bush Secrecy Efforts Crumbling
At long last, the pillars of the administration’s secrecy are beginning to crumble somewhat.
According to a Jan. 13 Washington Post story:
On Jan. 8, a federal magistrate ordered the administration to reveal whether it had backup copies of missing White House e-mails;
“The administration has brought these challenges on itself,” said Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine), the top Republican on the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee. She favored disclosing the intelligence budget. “By trying to keep secret information that doesn’t need to be secret, it invites skepticism of all of its secrecy claims.”
The Post story does note that the administration has been victorious in its quest for secrecy. For instance, the
Such losses are terrible and contribute to the atmosphere of secrecy. But the victories - which are increasing in number - are encouraging.
Posted 01-22-2008 5:32 PM EDT
Senior Bush Lawyers Discussed CIA Videotapes
Top White House lawyers were involved in discussions with the CIA about whether to destroy videotapes showing secret interrogations of two Al Qaeda operatives, according to a Dec. 19 New York Times story.
Unnamed officials are saying these lawyers were involved in the discussions to a much greater degree than the administration had said. Those who took part, according to the officials, included Alberto R. Gonzales (White House counsel until early 2005), David S. Addington (former counsel to Vice President Dick Cheney and now his chief of staff), John B. Bellinger III (senior lawyer at the National Security Council until January 2005) and Harriet E. Miers (successor to Gonzales as White House counsel).
And while previous reports said some administration officials advised against destroying the tapes, which occurred in November 2005, the Times story notes some conflicting recollections of what actually happened.
“One former senior intelligence official with direct knowledge of the matter said there was ‘vigorous sentiment’ to destroy the tapes among some top White House officials,” according to the newspaper.
But other officials said no one at the White House wanted to destroy the tapes. “Those officials acknowledged, however, that no White House lawyer gave a direct order to preserve the tapes of advised that destroying them would be illegal,” according to the Times.
The plot thickens …
Posted 12-19-2007 11:53 AM EDT
Congress Passes Bill to Strengthen Freedom of Information Act
Finally, government transparency wins a battle!
On Dec. 18, Congress gave its OK to a bill that would speed up the sometimes years-long process of obtaining public documents under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA).
The law already says that agencies must respond within 20 days of a FOIA request. But in reality, the process can drag out for months, or even years. This bill would require public tracking numbers to be assigned to requests. And if an agency exceeds the 20-day deadline, the agency could not charge FOIA requesters for research or copying costs, according to The Washington Post.
“In an era of increased government secrecy, we cannot postpone reforming the very act that keeps our government open to the people whose government this is,” said Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick J. Leahy (D-Vt.). “FOIA helps make government accountable and responsive to the people.”
If you’re keeping score, today it’s Transparency: 1. Secrecy: 0.
Posted 12-19-2007 11:51 AM EDT
|home | secrecy blog | about us | join us | other secrecy sites|
Powered by Public Citizen - www.citizen.org
Copyright © 2016 Public Citizen. All rights reserved.